Amazon.com
In this academic work of film and literary criticism, Judith Halberstam examines the monster as cultural object. She discusses classic gothic texts such as Frankenstein and Dracula, and then looks at the impact of changing technology (horror movies with special effects) for depicting monsters. Her argument is that the gothic in its more lurid, unabashedly violent, and perverse forms may be more empowering to the reader/viewer than in its carefully articulated, understated, and sublimated forms. H-Net Reviews calls Skin Shows an "intelligent, well-informed, and provocative piece of writing" and writes that its "greatest strength ... is that it allows for other critics of the Gothic to proceed more self-consciously about the presuppositions that particularly psychoanalysis has introduced into the academic discussion." One caveat, though: the language is somewhat turgid, with awkward verbs such as "gothicize" and "metaphorize."
Book Description
In this examination of the monster as cultural object, Judith Halberstam offers a rereading of the monstrous that revises our view of the Gothic. Moving from the nineteenth century and the works of Shelley, Stevenson, Stoker, and Wilde to contemporary horror film exemplified by such movies as Silence of the Lambs, Texas Chainsaw Massacre, and Candyman, Skin Shows understands the Gothic as a versatile technology, a means of producing monsters that is constantly being rewritten by historically and culturally conditioned fears generated by a shared sense of otherness and difference.
Deploying feminist and queer approaches to the monstrous body, Halberstam views the Gothic as a broad-based cultural phenomenon that supports and sustains the economic, social, and sexual hierarchies of the time. She resists familiar psychoanalytic critiques and cautions against any interpretive attempt to reduce the affective power of the monstrous to a single factor. The nineteenth-century monster is shown, for example, as configuring otherness as an amalgam of race, class, gender, and sexuality. Invoking Foucault, Halberstam describes the history of monsters in terms of its shifting relation to the body and its representations. As a result, her readings of familiar texts are radically new. She locates psychoanalysis itself within the gothic tradition and sees sexuality as a beast created in nineteenth century literature. Excessive interpretability, Halberstam argues, whether in film, literature, or in the culture at large, is the actual hallmark of monstrosity.
Customer Reviews:
A New Approach to Gothic.......2000-05-08
Indeed, the literary genre that we know as the gothic is inexhaustible in its interpretive capacity. From Freud's theory of the Uncanny and Mourning/Melancholia, to Feminist theories and reader response approaches (such as that of Norman Holland's), the gothic as a literary outsider has come a long way from its inception as a marginal form of literature to become one of the most studied and complex form of writing. Halberstam's book is one of the latest critical offerings of reading the Gothic, and it is indeed a timely arrival of an otherwise over-determined reading of this particular genre from the various theoretical approaches (interesting as they may be). Halberstam's approach, grounded in history and racism, renews the gothic's early preoccupation with otherness and the fear of it, but which emphasizes the societal fear of the alien/foreign other, and not so much the struggle between the public and private selves (the beloved of psychoanalytical theory). Her most interesting chapter is the reading of Stoker's `Dracula' as an anti-semitic propoganda text; indeed, I have appropriated some of her ideas in my view on postcolonial gothic, for I find that her theoretical stance has much to offer in this new and under-emphasized aspect of gothic literature. Halberstam's careful and brilliant intertwining of psychoanalysis, race-relations theory (history) and literary deconstruction is also critically executed in clear, precise language. I strongly recommend this book to anyone who wishes to have a fresh outlook on gothic literature.
Customer Reviews:
The Hobo Philosopher.......2007-09-12
This is not the book for the beginner. Unless you know economics and economic terminology save this book for some time down the road.
Keynes did not write for the general reader. He was clearly an elitist economist. He may know what he is talking about but I doubt that you will. I didn't.
His "A Tract on Monetary Reform" is a little more intelligible but not much. He is obviously not a teacher and isn't trying to be one. Try Galbraith, Heilbroner, Samuelson, or William Greider or anybody else first.
If you think you know your economics and you are looking for a challenge - this is your man.
seminal, but inscrutable for the average Joe.......2007-07-04
Published in 1936 during the height of the the Great Depression, Keynes's "General Theory" is widely credited, rightly or wrongly, as being the theory that actually pointed out how to end the Depression. It has never been out of print since its first publication.
The volume you're getting here hasn't much in terms of being "reader friendly." There is a brief (2-page) introduction. There are no footnotes (other than Keynes's original ones), and no helpful commentary or other aid that would help make Keynes's book more comprehensible to the general reader. So you're basically getting the bare bones.
But the book can be very tough going, even for those with extensive preparation in economics. It has plenty of nasty equations and there are more thistles than you'll find in an English hedgerow. In brief, it's one of those universally heralded classics that many pay lip service to but few have ever read.
As for whether this is "the book that ended the Depression," I'm not so sure. There were many competing theories floating around during the Depression, and Keynes's was only one of those.
While Keynes's recipe of counteracting a decline in private spending with an increase in government spending turned out to be what Roosevelt (and Hitler) actually did, certainly the war would have come along whether or not Keynes published his book. Hence governments would have stumbled upon "the Keynesian solution" on their own anyway.
The Failure of the "New Economics".......2007-05-22
Henry Hazlitt,
"A Path-Breaking Pioneer?
Now though I have analyzed Keynes's General Theory in the following pages theorem by theorem, chapter by chapter, and sometimes even sentence by sentence, to what to some readers may appear a tedious length, I have been unable to find in it a single important doctrine that is both true and original. What is original in the book is not true; and what is true is not original. In fact, as we shall find, even much that is fallacious in the book is not original, but can be found in a score of previous writers."
If you haven't read this masterpiece at least twice.......2007-04-18
...you're not a real person. If it was not for this wizard's brilliant insight on how to create prosperity with a little math and a little monetary expansion, there would undoubtedly still be poverty in the world today. It's not just a book, it's a religion. And it's the best religion.
Verdict: Read it at least twice.
Neoclassical Economics is a Special Case.......2007-03-30
I'm an undergrad economics student, and I was always puzzled by the "Keynesian" economics they taught me. I couldn't see how it fit in with the market clearing story they were also telling me. So I decided to give this book a shot. After reading it, I was surprised at how simple the main concept is. I didn't find it difficult to read at all, or badly organized (but maybe that's because I'm used to reading philosophy). Basically, just like they teach you in Principles of Macroeconomics, the heart of the theory is the Keynesian Cross (which is a rough approximation of Keynes' D-Z model in this book). The consumption function leaves a gap between income and expenditures, which must be filled by planned investment, or the economy will move to a lower equilibrium via the multiplier. Classical economics, in effect, just assumes that gap is always filled by planned investment (where the economy is at full employment, no less) without even making an argument for it. In the classical model, any decrease in planned investment is matched by an increase in consumption, or vice versa. But there is no good reason to think that will be the case, generally. If you hoard your money today, businessmen do not have a magic crystal ball that allows them to determine what you will spend it on in 5 years. Thus they do not invest. A decrease in consumption is not matched by an increase in planned investment. The economy will move to a new, lower equilibrium via the Keynesian Cross, in which income equals expenditures (i.e. no hoarding any more).
The one thing I did find confusing in the book, though, was Keynes' assertion that saving always equals investment, by defintion. I determined that this results from an incorrect definition of saving. While on an individual level, saving is income minus consumption, the same is not true for the economy as a whole. It is more accurate to say that saving in the aggregate is always zero, because an individual act of saving is always matched by an equal amount of dissaving by someone else (the saving deprives them of their income, unless the the savings are invested, in which case they are no longer savings). The gap between income and consumption, in the aggregate, is always investment. Its just the form of investment that changes. If the gap between income and consumption isn't filled by planned investment, it will be filled up by "unplanned" investment (i.e. inventories build up). In macroeconomic equilibrium, there is no unplanned investment. Thus, Y = Ip (planned investment) + C. Classical economics assumes that Y - C always equals Ip, and at the point of full employment. Keynes's theory is the more general case when Y - C could equal Iu (unplanned investment). In that case, the economy moves to a below optimal equilibrium that does not correspond to full employment.
I would definitely recommend this book if you're an economist, or if you have anything to do with public policy. Or even if you're just curious. Don't be frightened off by the people who tell you its "unreadable" or "a mess." They just can't handle a real scholar who writes precisely and clearly.
Average customer rating:
|
The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money
John Maynard Keynes
Manufacturer: Atlantic Publishers & Distributors (P) Ltd.
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Hardcover
 General
| Popular Economics
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
Theory
| Economics
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
Look Inside Business Books
| Trip
| Specialty Stores
| Books
ASIN: 8126905913
Release Date: 2006-07-06 |
Product Description
John Maynard Keynes is the great British economist of the twentieth century whose hugely influential work The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money is undoubtedly the century s most important book on economics--strongly influencing economic theory and practice, particularly with regard to the role of government in stimulating and regulating a nation's economic life. Keynes's work has undergone significant revaluation in recent years, and "Keynesian" views which have been widely defended for so long are now perceived as at odds with Keynes's own thinking. Recent scholarship and research has demonstrated considerable rivalry and controversy concerning the proper interpretation of Keynes's works, such that recourse to the original text is all the more important. Although considered by a few critics that the sentence structures of the book are quite incomprehensible and almost unbearable to read, the book is an essential reading for all those who desire a basic education in economics. The key to understanding Keynes is the notion that at particular times in the business cycle, an economy can become over-productive (or under-consumptive) and thus, a vicious spiral is begun that results in massive layoffs and cuts in production as businesses attempt to equilibrate aggregate supply and demand. Thus, full employment is only one of many or multiple macro equilibria. If an economy reaches an underemployment equilibrium, something is necessary to boost or stimulate demand to produce full employment. This something could be business investment but because of the logic and individualist nature of investment decisions, it is unlikely to rapidly restore full employment. Keynes logically seizes upon the public budget and government expenditures as the quickest way to restore full employment. Borrowing the money to finance the deficit from private households and businesses is a quick, direct way to restore full employment while at the same time, redirecting or siphoning
Average customer rating:
|
The Economics of Keynes in Historical Context: An Intellectual History of the General Theory
Michael Lawlor
Manufacturer: Palgrave Macmillan
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Hardcover
Economic History
| Economics
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
Theory
| Economics
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
General
| Popular Economics
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
General
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
Look Inside Business Books
| Trip
| Specialty Stores
| Books
All Titles
| Qualifying Textbooks - Fall 2007
| Stores
| Books
ASIN: 0333977173
Release Date: 2007-01-23 |
Book Description
There have been a number of important, pioneering studies in the analysis of Keynes' philosophical writings, his work as a policy advisor, as well as biographies. What has not been attempted is a full-scale analysis of how the various parts of Keynes' most mature work in the General Theory can be understood in the context of the social thought, policy questions and economics literature that shaped his outlook on theoretical questions. This book fills that gap and is a significant addition to the literature on the most influential economist of the twentieth century.
Average customer rating:
- This "Second Edition"fails to cover Keynes' math model
|
Second Edition Of General Theory (Second Edition of the General Theory)
G.c. Harcourt
Manufacturer: Routledge
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Library Binding
General
| Popular Economics
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
Theory
| Economics
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
General
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
All Titles
| Qualifying Textbooks - Fall 2007
| Stores
| Books
ASIN: 0415149428 |
Book Description
Keynes always intended to write "footnotes" to his masterwork The General Theory, which would take account of the criticisms it received and allow him to develop and refine his ideas further. However, a number of factors combined to prevent him from doing so before his death in 1946.
A wide range of Keynes scholars--including James Tobin, Paul Davidson and Lord Skidelsky--have written here the "footnotes" that Keynes never did. This first volume follows the structure of the original, offers attempts to clarify difficult passages and suggest ways in which Keynes might have revised his theory on the light of his subsequent work.
Customer Reviews:
This "Second Edition"fails to cover Keynes' math model.......2004-11-16
This "Second Edition" of the General Theory fails to improve upon Keynes's two basic models,the D-Z model of chapters 3,20-21 and the Y- multiplier model of chapter 10 of the General Theory(GT).The major result that Keynes derives from his analysis of the interactions of these two models is not even discussed.That result was that w/p=MPL/(MPC+MPI),where w equals the money wage,p represents the optimal expected price level,MPL is equal to the marginal product of labor,MPC equals the marginal propensity to spend on consumption goods,and MPI equals the marginal propensity to spend on investment goods,which are completely different in nature from consumption goods.The classical and/or neoclassical theory can be represented by the macroscopic,labor market clearing equation w/P=MPL,where P is the actual price level.This result is a special case of Keynes's general theory if and only if price expectations are optimal(p=P)and if the MPC+MPI=1.In this case the economy will be operating on the boundary of its static and dynamic Production Possibilities Frontiers(PPF's).There will be no involuntary unemployment.Involuntary unemployment will occur if P<p and/or if MPC+MPI<1.Any reader of this review can obtain these results if they are able to differentiate and integrate(take the anti derivative)Keynes's mathematical analysis in chapters 10,20 and 21 of the GT and know how to specify elasticities.It is an easy matter to extent Keynes's results so as to incorporate a government sector and international trade.Define MPG to be equal to the marginal propensity to spend on public goods,MPE equals the marginal propensity to spend on exports,and MPM equals the marginal propensity to spend on imports,where all marginal propensities are defined to lie between 0 and 1.Then w/p=MPL/(MPC+MPI+MPG+MPE-MPM).The only essay in the entire book that deals with chapters 20 and 21 was written by R O'Donnell.Nowhere in his essay does he attempt to derive the general results provided by Keynes in his footnotes to chapter 20 and then contrasted with the special results of A C Pigou in the appendix to chapter 19 of the General Theory.O'Donnell's results are completely inferior to the results obtained by Keynes some 60 years before this"Second Edition" was published.
Average customer rating:
- Asimakopulos overlooked Keynes's mathematical modeling
- A must have for students of Keynes' ideas
|
Keynes's General Theory and Accumulation (Modern Cambridge Economics Series)
A. Asimakopulos
Manufacturer: Cambridge University Press
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Paperback
General
| Popular Economics
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
Macroeconomics
| Economics
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
Theory
| Economics
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
General
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
Management
| Management & Leadership
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
ASIN: 0521368154 |
Book Description
This book makes Keynes's writing on his General Theory accessible to students by presenting this theory in a careful, consistent manner that is faithful to the original. Keynes's theory continues to be important, because the issues it raised, such as the problems of involuntary unemployment, the volatility of investment, and the complexity of monetary arrangements in modern capitalist economies, are still with us. Keynes's method of analysis, which tries to allow for the complications of dealing with historical time, deserves the careful attention given in this book. Keynes's formal analysis dealt only with a short period of time during which changes in productive capacity as a result of net investment were small relative to initial productive capacity. Roy Harrod and Joan Robinson were the two most prominent followers of Keynes who attempted to extend his analysis to the long period by allowing for the effects of investment on productive capacity as well as on effective demand. The careful examination of their writings on this topic is a natural complement to the presentation of Keynes's General Theory and makes clear the severe limitations on any use of equilibrium concepts in dealing with accumulation in models that try to observe Keynes's warnings about an unknowable future in the type of world we inhabit.
Customer Reviews:
Asimakopulos overlooked Keynes's mathematical modeling.......2005-03-24
The major conclusion that Asimakopulos(A)reaches in this book is that Keynes had no correctly defined and mathematically accurate representation of his theory of effective demand in the General Theory(GT;1936)that had a sound foundation in microeconomic theory.Thus,the GT must be rewritten and/or interpreted(reinterpreted)so as to correctly ground the intuitively correct ideas of Keynes on a sound foundation of microeconomic analysis.The foundation that A argues the GT should be based on is either the imperfectly competitive analysis of Richard Kahn and Joan Robinson or the more advanced version of the GT that Joan Robinson claimed that Michel Kalecki had written in explicitly mathematical terms three years before Keynes published his GT.The major criticism of A is that he completely overlooks the explicit mathematical model constructed by Keynes in chapters 20 and 21 of the GT.The model constructed by Keynes has an explicit microeconomic foundation based on a theory of the firm called pure competition.It is identical to the free competition assumption made by Pigou in 1933 in his book The Theory of Unemployment.This conclusion is obvious to any reader of the appendix to chapter 19 of the GT.Unfortunately,there is no evidence that A ever read Pigou's book or chapters 19,20,and 21 of the GT.A bases his entire assessment of Keynes's technical capabilities on a reading of pp.24-30 of chapter 3 of the GT alone.A's failure to read chapters 19,20,and 21 of the GT account for his mistaken belief that Keynes's analysis is unclear,ambiguous,confusing,incomplete,and problematic.
A must have for students of Keynes' ideas.......2001-03-25
If you ever tried to read Keynes's General Theory you know pretty well that some of Keynes's main ideas and some of his expositions of these same ideas are pretty confusing. It is well known by now that Keynes was in a hurry to get his book published and this is probably the reason why the GT is so hermetic. Asimakopulos goes a long way in explaining Keynes's ideas or, more precisely, some possible interpretations of these ideas in a simple and convincing manner. He also gives us two most wanted chapters with analysis of the works of two distinguished disciples of Keynes (i.e, Joan Robinson and Roy Harrod) and their attempts to extend his work to a dynamic framework. Of course, Asimakopulos' is not the only interpretation of Keynes'work. There is a whole "Keynes industry" in this world. It is, however, a short, advanced and neatly written piece of work and I consider it a must have especially for those who want a quick start on the topic.
Customer Reviews:
Patinkin erred when he accepted the claims of Richard Kahn.......2005-03-29
Patinkin's(P)basic conclusion in this book is that the theory of effective demand, presented by Keynes in the General Theory(1936;GT) in chapters 3(chapter 3 contains a brief outline of what Keynes would do in the other chapters mentioned in this sentence),10,19,20,21 and the appendix to chapter 19 in order to explain the problem of involuntary unemployment(the existence of an unemployment equilibrium),as well as why labor ,in the aggregate,would be unable to cut its money wage,is defective because Keynes did not provide any correct microfoundations , mathematical model or economic analysis showing how such a result could occur in a rigorous,formal manner.Patinkin argues that what Keynes meant by an unemployment equilibrium was in fact an unemployment disequilibrium where the adjustment path to a new full employment equilibrium state was very slow to occur in real time because the adjustment path of the general level of prices and wages was sticky and slow as opposed to the classical and neoclassical position that the new equilibrium state would occur quickly because price and wage changes occurred rapidly.(Patinkin completely demolished the strange claim ,made by a number of economists such as Franco Modigliani, that Keynes had assumed rigid money wages and/or prices.)The crucial difference,then, between Keynes's approach and the classical/neoclassical approach, is in the actual speed of adjustment of the level of prices and money wages in the macroeconomic system as a whole.There is some support for this interpretation of Keynes's analysis,but it is based on a study of Keynes's obiter dicta and not on the crucial chapters 19(and the appendix to chapter 19),20 and 21,taken as a whole.Patinkin's crucial error was to ignore the entire D-Z analysis of chapters 20 and 21 and concentrate mainly on chapters 2, 3,10 ,and 19,based on the claims made to him by Richard Kahn and Joan Robinson that Keynes was a poor mathematician by 1927 who had not taken the time to master the theory of value(microeconomics) and thus was unable to formalize his theory of effective demand in mathematical terms despite the enormous amount of time that they(Kahn and Robinson)had spent trying to correct the many errors made by Keynes in writing the GT.Keynes's general theory results can be easily derived by any reader of this review who is able to differentiate and integrate the results provided by Keynes on pp.55-56,ft.2,chapter 20,(pp.280-286)and chapter 21(pp.304-306,especially p.306),where Keynes presents the generalized Quantity theory of money that incorporates the case of involuntary unemployment.Keynes's general theory is simply that w/p=mpl/(mpc+mpi),where w/p equals the real wage,mpl is the marginal product of labor in the aggregate,mpc is equal to the marginal propensity to spend on consumption goods,and mpi is the marginal propensity to spend on investment goods.If mpc+mpi =1,then Keynes's theory merges with the neoclassical theory.On the other hand,if mpc+mpi
<1,then a unemployment equilibrium exists which is impossible to eliminate by decreasing the money wage since the money wage must increase,not decrease,in order to maintain the necessary optimality condition for equilibrium.I recommend this book for purchase as long as the reader keeps in the back of his mind the disinformation that Kahn and Robinson were providing Patinkin over a nearly 50 year period of time in their exchanges of private correspondence,a correspondence that Patinkin just assumed was correct.
Average customer rating:
- Felix never covers Keynes's modeling in chapters 20 and 21
|
Biography of an Idea: John Maynard Keynes and the General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money
David Felix
Manufacturer: Transaction Publishers
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Hardcover
General
| Popular Economics
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
Theory
| Economics
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
General
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
General
| England
| Europe
| History
| Subjects
| Books
20th Century
| England
| Europe
| History
| Subjects
| Books
ASIN: 1560001496 |
Customer Reviews:
Felix never covers Keynes's modeling in chapters 20 and 21.......2005-04-03
Felix simply lacks the necessary mathematical training in the differential and integral calculus that he needs in order for him to be successful in critically assessing the model of the General Theory(GT) constructed by Keynes in chapters 3,10,19,20,and 21 of the GT, which is his goal in this book.Instead,Felix concentrates on an amalgam of chapters 3 and 10,combined with the implicit and completely uncritical acceptance of the Richard Kahn-Joan Robinson story that Keynes was a poor mathematician by 1927 who had never formally mastered microeconomic theory and who,because of these defects ,was never able to correctly formalize the microeconomic foundations that supported the aggregate demand-aggregate supply analysis of his theory of effective demand in chapter 3 of the GT because he made a number of errors in constructing his aggregate supply curve.Therefore,according to Felix,Keynes failed to show the existence of either involuntary unemployment and/or the existence of an unemployment equilibrium.Therefore,Keynes has misled generations of readers and students of economics and of economic policy.It is a simple matter for any competent mathematician to derive Keynes's major result from the elasticity analysis specified by Keynes in either chapter 20 or in chapter 21.That analysis leads to the following -w/p=mpl/(mpc+mpi),where w/p=the real wage,mpl=the marginal product of labor in the aggregate,and mpc and mpi equal the marginal propensities to spend on consumption goods and investment goods,respectively.If mpc +mpi
<1,then you automatically obtain an unemployment equilibrium with some level of involuntary unemployment.Only in the special case of mpc+mpi =1 is the neoclassical case of resource scarcity operational.Felix does do a fair job of covering accurately a number of Keynes's obiter dictum in his book.A reader might benefit from these discussions.
Average customer rating:
|
Can the Free Market Pick Winners?: What Determines Investment
Manufacturer: M.E. Sharpe
ProductGroup: Book
Binding: Hardcover
General
| Popular Economics
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
Public Finance
| Economics
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
General
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
General
| Investing
| Business & Investing
| Subjects
| Books
ASIN: 1563243067 |
Books:
- Small Change: A Life of Tom Waits
- Small Nation, Global Cinema: The New Danish Cinema (Public Worlds)
- Sylvia: The Shooting Script (Newmarket Shooting Script Series)
- Symmetry and Spectroscopy: An Introduction to Vibrational and Electronic Spectroscopy
- Tallulah!: The Life and Times of a Leading Lady
- The Artist as Monster: The Cinema of David Cronenberg
- The Digital Film Event
- The Evil Dead Companion
- The Film Festival Guide: For Filmmakers, Film Buffs, and Industry Professionals (Film Festival Guide)
- The Gardener's Son
Books Index
Books Home
Recommended Books
- e-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimed
- The Sneaky Chef: Simple Strategies for Hiding Healthy Foods in Kids Favorite Meals
- Promised Lands: Cinema, Geography, Modernism
- Photoshop Retouching Cookbook for Digital Photographers: 113 Easy-to-Follow Recipes to Improve Your
- Small Business Start-up Kit for California
- The Rejection Collection: Cartoons You Never Saw, and Never Will See, in The New Yorker
- One Tough Mother: Success in Life, Business and Apple Pies
- Pricing Corporate Securities as Contingent Claims
- Regions, Globalization, and the Knowledge-Based Economy
- The Fall Of Heartless Horse
The Female Thermometer: Eighteenth-Century Culture and the Invention of the Uncanny (Ideologies of Desire)
QUEER GOTHIC
The Freudian Body
The Recess: A Tale of Other Times (Eighteenth-Century Novels By Women)
The Children of the Abbey
